A signature is a weak kind of evidence.
It proves that someone accepted the menu as it arrived. It does not prove who shaped the menu before arrival, who removed the inconvenient candidates, who decided which facts survived, or who had the authority to reopen the list once it looked settled.
That is where the custody trail matters.
A review point is only meaningful if something can still change there. Not language around the decision, not the ceremonial surface of accountability, but the actual option set: what is still visible, what can be restored, what can be refused, what can be reordered, what can be sent back.
Control lives before the signature.
After the narrowing, review can become typography.
Emma Claire Miller 